Analyses from the horses’ mouths
Influential people seem to be agreeing with me about the Hutton inquiry. Rod Liddle attacks Hutton’s ludicrously narrow terms of reference, while Andrew Gilligan stands up for himself, making the important, but apparently easily forgotton point, that he was right.
Original article (including comments)
No comments
No comments yet.
Leave a comment
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.